Silly Mozilla! Look!
|The Underground Zone||Full||Full||Poor||Tolerable|
|The Mine of Lights||Okay||Full||Tolerable||Tolerable|
From this study, it is clear that browser rendering in general is not as good as it could be. However, no unusable sites were encountered in this test.
Scoring method: The scoring method used is as follows:
These are then converted into percentages and given a weighting factor of 1.15 to allow for general IE incompatibilities and poor HTML coding.
Opera takes first place, with 72.5%
Netpositive takes second place, with 59.8%
Mozilla takes third place, with a mere 36.8%
NEWS FLASH!!! Mac Internet Exploder, previously thought quite a good product, actually takes last place in this study, with a pathetic 34.5%. In this test, the font rendering was the browser's biggest weakness, with extreme aliasing visible on most sites, and very uneven font size interpretation, which has become a rather famous feature of the Internet Exploiter range of browsers.
| O p e r a||Opera 72.5%|
| N e t p o s i t i v e||Netpositive 59.8%|
| M o z i l l a||Mozilla 36.8%|
| M a c I E||Mac IE 34.5%|
From observing these results, we can conclude several key facts:
Last updated: 23/05/02